The Richard Donner cut of Superman II is an infamous legend come to life. Director Donner shot most of the sequel at the same time as his first blockbuster film, but somewhere along the line, the producers and studio lost confidence and brought in Richard Lester (The Three Musketeers) to rework the film, and receive sole credit. For years fans speculated on how different the final film was from Donner's original until an underground copy appeared showing a fully formed feature. In an unprecedented move, Warner Brothers officially embraces this alternate version. For those who have not been part of the rumor mill, know that Donner shot all the footage with Lex Luthor (Gene Hackman). You can find blow-by-blow descriptions of what is new/changed elsewhere, but most of the changes deal with Christopher Reeve and Margot Kidder as the comic-book couple. Donner's cut provides alternate scenes for how Lois tests her hunch that Clark is Superman, the moment he reveals his identity, and how Lois unlearns that truth. Thing is, Lester's reshots are stronger, adding weight to the romance between the two, lifting the picture's stature. Lester also added the dandy Eiffel Tower opening. Donner's chief additions are in the Fortress of Solitude, where Marlon Brando returns to teach (Susannah York, as Superman's mom, appears in the Lester cut). The producers cut Brando's footage so they wouldn't have to pay him millions. The Brando/Reeve scenes continue the father/son dynamic of the first film. There is a great lesson in editing--Lester's less is better than Donner's more--when you compare how Kent turns back into Superman after losing his powers. The Donner cut is completely formed but does use some rehearsal footage, new effects, and some pieces shot by Lester. The history of cinema has many of these stories of movies reshot, hijacked, and changed from the original version, but here the underdog wins and Donner gets his chance to change history, even adding a note in the end credits about the use of fur and smoking as regrettable choices of the time. Director Donner and creative consultant Tom Mankiewicz have a jolly good time revisiting their past on the commentary track. You get a clearer picture of who shot what, but the two have nothing good to say about Lester's edition. Donner doesn't go much into why he was dropped, just a difference of opinion and the need not to pay Brando. He also explains why the déjà vu ending of this edition was used in the first movie and a new ending would have been thought up for part 2. A quick featurette looks at how Michael Thau and a small crew reconstructed the film and compares several scenes from both versions. Also added are additional scenes shot by Donner but not used, most with Hackman. --Doug Thomas
Customer Review: Donner's Superman II
I'll keep this short because this movie has been out for over 2 years now on DVD. I was really excited to hear that the Warner's decided to finally release this urban legend that we all heard about. Being a huge Superman fan, I was excited to finally see the footage with Brando. Although that footage was interesting, the movie for me, just didn't work. Chris Reeve, and Margot Kidder did a fine job in their respective roles, but the movie was campy at best and I thought the whole point of making a superhero movie back in the day was to show "what if Superman was real" in a real life situation. Turning back time twice was downright retarded and then at the very end of Donner's version on Supes II where he goes back to the diner, made no sense whatsoever. Turning it back once was bad, but twice?!? I still admit when I was 6 years old and my Dad took me and my sister to see the first film in the theater, when Superman let out that scream, it scared the Bejesus out of me. Even to this day I have a hard time watching that because Superman is such a good "person", who would make him that angry to let that kind of a cry out? Obviously Luthor. Iyla Salkind was quoted saying that Lester's version was better. He was right. Donner is a great director and he tried to keep it light, and more geared towards the 1980's family. In that respect, he did a good job. I would have to agree that after seeing both versions, I like Lester's version better. Nonetheless, its good that we're able to see both versions now when Superman is needed now more than ever. Just my two cents.
Customer Review: RICHARD DONNER ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The script, the acting, Marlon Brando...all combined- cannot even touch the Superman II that was released in America back in the early 80's. After seeing this version of the film, I want a refund for seeing the other one. You can't even commpare the two. It's like comparing an Academy Award Winning Film to Sesame Street. The CEO of Warner Bros. should have been put in jail or fired for releasing that crap and making us pay money to see it.
For some of us, creating a healthy environment inside your home is just as important as being healthy outdoors. Now we're learning that many conventional cleaning products we grew up with contain harmful ingredients with chemicals such as ammonia and chlorine. As an example, ammonia found in conventional window cleaners can irritate your eyes, skin and respiratory passages. According to the EPA, the chlorine found in household bleach is poisonous. It can burn your skin and eyes on contact, and can be fatal if inhaled.
Although evidence concerning the harmful effects of chemicals in conventional cleaning products is mounting, only a small percentage of chemicals have been adequately tested for their health and environmental effects. Furthermore, the chemicals tested to date have not been examined in combination with other chemicals. Making matters worse is the fact that cleaning product manufacturers are not required by law to reveal their products' ingredients.
What is known is that some of the harmful effects of chemicals contained in conventional cleaning products include headaches, skin rashes, nausea and vomiting, upper respiratory irritation, fatigue, wheezing and coughing, dizziness, irritability, asthma, eye irritation and eye damage, hormone disruption, organ damage including liver and kidney damage, cancer, and fetal damage.
When shopping for green cleaners, remember to check labels to ensure the products are truly green. Following are guidelines for shopping for green cleaners:- Check the label for a manufacturer's statement that "we disclose all ingredients." Then read the list.
- If water is listed as an ingredient, make sure it is purified water since water can contain a lot of chlorine or heavy metals.
- If "surfacants" (a cleaning agent) or "chelating agents" are listed as ingredients, make sure they are plant-based or vegetable-based since petroleum-based surfacants and chelating agents are highly toxic.
- Make sure the product does not contain preservatives.
- Check the label to see if it mentions a fragrance. A fragrance ingredient is likely a perfume which is derived from synthetic chemicals. A nontoxic fragrance is derived from botanicals or essential oils. The label will specify if it is nontoxic.
- Be wary of a label touting the product is "fragrance-free." This can mean the manufacturer used a synthetic chemical to mask any fragrances in the product.
Green cleaning products can be purchased at natural grocers.
Hilary Basile is a writer for MyGuidesUSA.com. At http://www.myguidesusa.com, you will find valuable tips and resources for handling life's major events. Whether you're planning a wedding, buying your first home, anxiously awaiting the birth of a child, contending with a divorce, searching for a new job, or planning for your retirement, you'll find answers to your questions at MyGuidesUSA.com.
Find home improvement tips and resources at http://homeimprovement.myguidesusa.com/
hoover s2220